The reading this week begins shortly before the coming of Christ to the Americas where he visited the Nephites and the Lamanites. It says “the prophecies of the prophets began to be fulfilled more fully; for there began to be greater signs and greater miracles wrought among the people.” However, despite increased miracles and signs, the people who didn’t believe in Christ persecuted those who did “saying: Behold the time is past, and the words of Samuel are not fulfilled; therefore, your joy and your faith concerning this thing hath been vain.”
They caused a “great uproar throughout the land; and the people who believed began to be very sorrowful, lest by any means those things which had been spoken might not come to pass.” There began to be armed conflicts and heated disagreements among the people. The groups of people who had secret agreements among one another to try to achieve power and wealth “had become so numerous, and did slay so many of the people, and did lay waste so many cities, and did spread so much death and carnage throughout the land, that it became expedient that all the people, both the Nephites and the Lamanites, should take up arms against them.”
The people who believed in God and followed God “did unite with their brethren, the Nephites, and were compelled, for the safety of their lives and their women and their children, to take up arms against those Gadianton robbers, yea, and also to maintain their rights, and the privileges of their church and of their worship, and their freedom and their liberty.” However, despite uniting against a common enemy, they were still fighting among themselves, and the “robbers did gain many advantages over them.” At this time the people were “in a state of many afflictions; and the sword of destruction did hang over them, insomuch that they were about to be smitten down by it, and this because of their iniquity.”
Something I’ve thought a lot about regarding the destruction of civilizations is whether God smites these civilizations because of their wickedness, or whether destruction is just an inevitable consequence of societies that stray too far from the spectrum of shared values that allows humans to live in peace together. I don’t think that once societies hit a threshold of wickedness that God is annoyed enough to try to destroy the people. Instead, I think it’s like all commandments. The wisdom for them is sound, but we don’t always understand what we sometimes perceive as a restriction on our freedom when in reality it’s usually setting guidelines to allow us to thrive more fully by giving us a framework in which to operate. In games, morality, society, and life, there must be rules to create order.
Without order, there’s chaos. When everyone tries to play by their own rules, the game (a board game, society, or life) is ruined. You can’t play/live/thrive together when you aren’t using the same framework. We need some basic shared values (not necessarily shared beliefs) for the game to continue. In the case of the US, our shared values used to be Judeo-Christian values of equality of all men/women before God and in society (regardless of wealth or position which by extension means equal application of the law), and refraining from lying, cheating, stealing, murdering, etc. I think that societies and people destroy themselves by going to war with one another when they drift too far from common values that allow for peace and prosperity. In the scriptures it says that when the majority of the people choose evil, then they’re ripe for destruction. However, if people “repent” or change then they’re spared. To me this doesn’t seem to imply a vengeful God intent on punishing people for wrongs, but rather a continuum with consequences that at some point may tip past the point of no return.
The scriptures show us repeated cycles of the people living in peace and going to war. The cause of the rise and fall of conflict and peace among these people is the same, and it’s not restricted to scripture. When societies start to elevate certain people above others in worth or importance, and the rule of law ceases to apply equally to all people regardless of position or class, and groups of people begin to cheat one another, battle for wealth and power, and society/civilization begins to decay. What’s funny is that the word “civilization” seems to encompass this meaning, the action or process of being courteous or polite, noncriminal. What’s funny is that we have groups in the US right now, particularly BLM (Black Lives Matter Inc), who state a main objective is to rid us of “the oppression of respectability.” Respectability is defined as “proper, correct, and socially acceptable.” They are literally and actively seeking to undermine civility, or the representation of civilization, and we wonder why the world is going to crap.
There are a lot of really interesting studies about how sexual morality and promiscuity are also one of the biggest determiners of the health of a civilization. Civilizations that permit promiscuity undermine the order of civilization. Stable family units are the basis of ordered society. Promiscuity leads to kids without a set of parents, fewer stable homes, and increases in cheating and divorce. I read about how monogamy and restrained sexual passions allow you to bridle your passions and channel them into more productive outlets like career, family, and community, while promiscuity indulges people’s hedonism so that they’re constantly seeking satisfaction and pleasure instead of seeking to building things like family, life, or community. Again, we want the effects of following the rules without having to actually follow them.
Other symptoms of a decaying society are the glorification of violence, and the debasement of the currency. You can find a lot of examples of inflation and what causes it (governments), but I really liked this article about it
https://mises.org/library/inflation-and-fall-roman-empire. It explained how the rulers of Rome and the military (those who worked for the government) benefitted from a dual monetary system where the people at the top reaped benefits, while everyone else struggled to get by because their purchasing power was constantly being undermined. That doesn’t sound anything like the rich benefiting from rising asset prices while regular people have the purchasing power of their savings constantly diminished like today, does it? This seems extremely relevant to me when we consider the chaos of all of the currencies in the world from Venezuela to Zimbabwe. The plague of deficit spending is also addressed, and we won’t go too far into it, but the manipulation of currencies and deficit spending to the benefit of the few to the detriment of many are what’s caused things like the sovereign debt crisis in Europe (Greece most famously), stagnant growth over the course of decades in Japan, and 0% to negative interest rates across the board, and rising inequality all over the world. But again, without arguing morality, how can we say that this is wrong? Unfortunately if we aren’t going to be blazing hypocrites, we need to be consistent and moral all the time, not just when it’s convenient or we’re the one getting screwed. There is no moral high ground if you don’t care about morality unless it affects you negatively.
I know this is a bit of a tangent for a Sunday School lesson, but I hope I can help you see the relevance. When we consider the scripture that tells us that “wickedness never was happiness,” I take it to mean that doing the wrong thing doesn’t lead to the good outcomes that we want. These principles are broadly applied. Fiscal or monetary wickedness (doing the wrong thing, being irresponsible, spending what you don’t have) never leads to prosperity. Sexual wickedness (doing the wrong thing and only pursuing pleasure) doesn’t actually lead to satisfaction. I’ve watched the world around me double down on things that are wrong, and act surprised when there are negative consequences.
How can we be surprised that people don’t value life in terms of mass shootings, terrorism, or murder, when we as societies kill unborn babies with abortion (usually for convenience), fail to provide shelter for homeless and let people die on the streets, and let the poor go hungry (whether in our own communities, countries or the world)? How can we expect people to value the sanctity of life when so much of what we do as a society teaches that life is not precious or valuable or sacred at all? When nothing is sacred anymore? We have to do better. We have to actually live the values we profess to have.
How can we be shocked or surprised at all the variations of pornography and sexual exploitation and rape when we as societies profess that sexuality is just pleasure, a need to be filled, and that it doesn’t mean anything special? How can we sexualize children more and more and debase innocence and be surprised when that leads to even worse things? How can we do everything wrong, celebrate it, and then act surprised or horrified to find out there are consequences?
When we discourage marriage, encourage divorce, and destroy the family unit, the foundation of ordered society and civilization, how can we be surprised that the structure and rules of society are crumbling? One thing the pandemic showed us starkly is how much families have shifted the responsibility of their children to the state. Here in the US people were lamenting what children would do if schools were closed because then those kids would have “food insecurity,” meaning that some kids wouldn’t have anything to eat if the school wasn’t feeding them breakfast and lunch. As a society we’ve hoisted the responsibility of feeding our children from the parents onto the state. Teachers and schools shouldn’t be responsible for feeding your children. They shouldn’t be responsible for caring for the emotional, spiritual, and/or physical needs of children. We need to take more responsibility for our own lives, our own children, and our own communities.
Jordan Peterson, a Canadian Psychologist, talks about this. He talks about how the voluntary acceptance of responsibility is what gives us meaning in our lives. The more we seek supposed freedom by refusing responsibility (regarding the state of our lives, our finances, our kids), the more we diminish meaning in our lives. I think that the acceptance of the burden of responsibility and bearing it well is what we consider success. For example, in any area of life, it is the voluntary acceptance of responsibility and striving to bear it well that constitutes success. In our pursuit of ultimate freedom from rules and responsibilities in our modern societies, we’ve destroyed the basis of our meaning and success.
Back to the reading. The leader of the wicked group of people sends a letter to the leader of the people, Lachoneus. Lachoneus was “exceedingly astonished, because of the boldness of Giddianhi demanding the possession of the land of the Nephites, and also of threatening the people and avenging the wrongs of those that had received no wrong, save it were they had wronged themselves by dissenting away unto those wicked and abominable robbers.” This reminds me of what’s happening in the US right now too. There are groups of people, who I believe are a minority, who are demanding that the country acquiesce to them. They’re threatening everyone because of perceived wrongs.
In the reading, the good guys prepared for conflict. They only plan to defend themselves, instead of going after the bad guys. They “put up their prayers unto the Lord their God, that he would deliver them in the time that their enemies should come down against them to battle.” When the bad guys come to battle against them, “behold, great and terrible was the day that they did come up to battle; and they were girded about after the manner of robbers; and they had a lamb-skin about their loins, and they were dyed in blood, and their heads were shorn, and they had head-plates upon them; and great and terrible was the appearance of the armies of Giddianhi, because of their armor, and because of their being dyed in blood.” The bad guys use fear and intimidation as a deliberate tactic. They want to scare the people into submission, into surrender. They wanted to punish the people for things that they didn’t do. I don’t know about you, but this tactic in the Book of Mormon and in our society today is against my religion. It’s wrong. It’s evil. I believe that man should be punished for their own sins and not for Adam’s transgressions, or that we should only be held responsible for the things that we do, not for Adam's sins or for the sins of our ancestors. I didn't want to bring politics into this, but the concept original sin in which we are all born sinful, is one that a certain political party is pushing. I watched a community event in which one of the presidential candidates spoke of us as a people and a nation needing to address the original sin of 400 years of slavery. There's so much that's morally wrong with this that I wasn't even sure that I should mention it here. I don't believe in original sin. I don't believe in holding people accountable for things that they had no part in.
The good guys fell down on the ground, praying to God for protection. There’s very little in life that we can control. We have some control over our own lives, and little control over the direction of society or the world. We are fragile and frail, and much of the control that we think we have is an illusion. Prayer is what we do to try to influence those things which are out of our control. The battle ensues, and the good guys win. Afterwards, “their hearts were swollen with joy, unto the gushing out of many tears, because of the great goodness of God in delivering them out of the hands of their enemies; and they knew it was because of their repentance and their humility that they had been delivered from an everlasting destruction.”
Though the deliverance in these chapters was physical, I think that we can superimpose the lessons in the story onto other areas of life. We can talk about emotional or spiritual deliverance instead of just physical deliverance. Though The Book of Mormon is full of physical battles, the stories can apply to us. We can think of it in the context of the armour of God (see the bible) with the shield of faith, the sword of the spirit, etc. We too can prepare as best we can, and when the time comes to battle, we pray for strength and guidance and then boldly act.
It said near the end of the reading that “behold, there was not a living soul among all the people of the Nephites who did doubt in the least the words of all the holy prophets who had spoken; for they knew that it must needs be that they must be fulfilled. And they knew that it must be expedient that Christ had come, because of the many signs which had been given, according to the words of the prophets; and because of the things which had come to pass.” I mentioned this in my last lesson, but I liked how it spoke of the people believing because of the many signs which had been given. In the recent reading in Helaman 14 it said, “many shall see greater things than these,
to the intent that they might believe that
these signs and these wonders should come to pass upon all the face of this land,
to the intent that there should be no cause for unbelief among the children of men.”
These scriptures tell me that there will be evidences given to people by God, with the intent that they should believe. We were never meant to blindly believe in prophecy, God, the prophets, or The Church. We are supposed to experiment in our own lives on a micro-level and receive evidence, experience, and knowledge there, and we are also supposed to watch society and the world follow the macro-level prophecies written about in the Bible and the Book of Mormon, so that when we see them fulfilled, we will have reason to believe. Because the people had the prophecies proven to them as they watched them fulfilled, and presumably had individual spiritual experiences in their own lives as well, they believed and “they did forsake all their sins, and their abominations, and their whoredoms, and did serve God with all diligence day and night.”
It says a few different places that Nephi ministered with “power and with great authority.” Guess what the reaction was of the people who weren’t trying to follow God or Christ. You’ll never guess. Nephi was casting out devils, performing miracles, and raising his brother from the dead and providing evidence of the truth of his words, and “they were angry with him, even because he had greater power than they. . .” They were mad at him because he was more powerful than they were! How dumb is that! They were also mad at him because it wasn’t possible “that they could disbelieve his words, for so great was his faith on the Lord Jesus Christ. . .” The bad guys “saw it, and did witness of it, and were angry with him because of his power; and he did also do many more miracles, in the sight of the people, in the name of Jesus.” Another place in the reading it talked about the people willfully rebelling against God. They didn't do bad things in ignorance. They knew better and they chose to do evil things willfully.
In the end, their chief judge is murdered and it says that basically the government is destroyed. The bad guys who tried to destroy the government appoint an anti-Christ King over themselves. Everyone else divided into tribes which consisted of their friends and families. There is some tenuous peace between many of the tribes, but the shared values that previously bound them together are gone. They don’t have the same laws, but “they were united in the hatred of those who had entered into a covenant to destroy the government.”
To me, the reading this week was a stark warning of what can happen to people when we disregard the consequences of immorality. Everyone wants to live in a moral society with moral leaders, but many people don’t want those rules of morality to apply to them. It also is a warning of what happens when we no longer have shared values. When order breaks down, chaos ensues. The fall of the Nephite civilization into tribalism is so interesting, and what’s even crazier is that it’s not out of the realm of possibility for our societies today. We like to believe that we're more evolved, more enlightened, or somehow more civilized than the rest of humanity because of our modernity, but this isn't the case, and to believe it is dangerous.
It reminds me of a quote by Jeffery R. Holland in a CES broadcast in 2015 when he said, “We know for certain that if or when everything else in the latter days is down or dying: if governments, economies, industries, and institutions crumble; if societies and cultures become a quagmire of chaos and insecurity, nevertheless through it all the gospel of Jesus Christ and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints that bears that gospel to the world will stand triumphant. It will stand undefiled in God’s hand until the very Son of God Himself comes to rule and reign as Lord of lords and King of kings. Nothing is more certain in this world. Nothing is more sure. Nothing could be more of an antidote to anxiety.”