Sunday, October 25, 2020

Val's Email Sunday School: All Things Were Common Among Them



The lesson this week begins with a note that “The Lord commanded His disciples to write the things they experienced (see 3 Nephi 27:23–24). Why do the leaders of the church reccommend that we journal or keep records of our own lives? Why did the Lord command in these chapters that the people should write the things they have experienced?

I’ve thought about this. One of the first reasons I can think of is so that you remember your experiences. I’m amazed at the things that I can forget. We can forget that we’ve had touching, inspirational, or spiritual experiences at all if we don’t write them down. Time can dim our memories and we can forget how powerful or striking they may have been at the time. However, if you write things down for yourself, in your own words, it’s hard to argue with a past self.

As we write down the things we’ve experienced, inspirations, and impressions, the experiences and interpretations of our past self can help us in a few ways. If you’re in a worse place, you can be inspired by how valiant, faithful, or steadfast you were in the past, and strive to be like him or her again. After all, it was you. You can’t argue much that you can’t be as good as another version of yourself. You can draw inspiration or strength from a past version of yourself just like you could from any other example. If you’re better off than your past self, you can be proud of your progress and how far you’ve come.

Writing things down helps in other ways too. It clarifies what’s in your mind. There are studies about the benefits of writing as a way to deal with difficulty and as a means to relieve stress. Spiritually, writing down inspiration and impressions helps you to see patterns emerge. Maybe you’ve been worried about something or praying for an answer to a problem. As we write things down we can see the repetition of themes or ideas, which can help us realize we may be being guided more than we thought.

There was quite a bit of contaversy regarding what the people should call the church. Christ's response was simple. “8 And how be it my church save it be called in my name? For if a church be called in Moses’ name then it be Moses’ church; or if it be called in the name of a man then it be the church of a man; but if it be called in my name then it is my church, if it so be that they are built upon my gospel.” We are to call Christ's teachings his own, and his church his own, and his people his own. I think this is what it means to take upon us the name of Christ. When we label ourselves as Christians or followers of Christ, we are labeling ourselves with his name, and taking his name as our own descriptor, which should mean that we believe, follow, or adhere to his teachings.

Later we’re told in several places not to “spurn the doings of the Lord.” To spurn means to reject with disdain or contempt, so we’re advised not to reject with disdain and contempt the “the activities in which [the Lord] engages” or in other words not to be disdainful about the performance, implementation, activities, actions, undertaking, endeavor, work, ventures, etc of the Lord (and if you believe this is his church) then the activities and efforts of his followers and church.

We read that Christ formed a Church. A church often describes a building, but can also refer to a "particular denomination, belonging to the same city, country, nation . . . or constituting one congregation." A congregation is a group of people assembled to worship. The reading tells us that all the people were converted. It says that there were no contentions or disputations, and all the people dealt justly with each other. There were miracles, respect, prosperity, and peace. They rebuilt great cities and lived in a moral, just, and good society. 

Now we’re getting into some interesting things that I want to really focus on. “3 And they had all things common among them; therefore there were not rich and poor, bond and free, but they were all made free, and partakers of the heavenly gift.” I want to spend a lot of my time now discussing this. What does it mean to have all things common among them? How did they eradicate poverty? Is this socialism/communism? If not, why not? We’re told that all things were common among them. This sure seems like they shared everything. That sounds like Communism. It also sounds like the Law of Consecration, which is something that really deserves it’s own study. We’ll only talk briefly about those things here.

The Law of Consecration and Communism/Socialism appear the same on the surface. How can two things that appear so similar be so different? They have to be different because President Benson was an extremely vocal advocate against communism, warning it was one of the greatest evils. He didn’t mince words at all. It’s interesting to read some of his past talks through the lens of our current culture. I’m not an expert, but from my understanding Communism and Socialism are just degrees on the same spectrum. My understanding is that it is a forced ideology. The state compels you to give up some of what you have, and redistributes it with the intent of achieving equity. A hallmark of communism is that the workers own the means of production, which basically negates private property (depending on how far along on the scale the state in question is).

Could the primary difference between these ideologies be whether the sharing is forced or voluntary? We believe in private ownership as evidenced by the commandment that we should not steal. How can we steal something from someone else unless there is ownership? We’re also told that we shouldn’t covet what our neighbor has. So at least now, perhaps pre-law of consecration we believe in private ownership.

We also talk about how all of the blessings and things we have are really God’s. So while we own things now, really, we recognize that it is God’s. This is true of our bodies, our possessions, our money. The parable of the talents, though often equated with literal talents, is actually a parable about money that illustrates stewardship. It shows how it is our responsibility to take what we have been given (money, talents, opportunities, privilege) and to magnify it and to make it greater. Stewardship is the obligation to care for and make better the things we're responsible for. 

Within the law of Consecration it also appears that there is not necessarily equity (equal outcomes), but rather a base level of equality. We read in Doctrine and Covenants that they were to “appoint unto this people their portions, every man equal according to his family, according to his circumstances and his wants and needs.” So it appears that while everyone’s basic needs may have been met, people’s varying wants and needs were still taken into consideration. Also, I’ve written in the past what it mean to consecrate yourself to something, so we won’t go into that in as much depth here. It was basically to dedicate something to a specific purpose, goal, or service.

If we were to consecrate our money or lives to God, it could mean that we are dedicating our efforts and money to bettering earth, bettering the lives of others, or bettering the world. Personally, I think this is what it means to live the law of consecration and to build the kingdom of God upon the earth. Since people have so many different ideas, opinions, and interests, they would approach the problem of bettering the world in very different ways. They would apply their money to different problems and improve things different ways, but this could still count as living the law of consecration even though everyone's approach would be different. I think this diverse approach would lead to better outcomes than a centralized state trying to micromanage everything because the people would autonomously decide how to dedicate their capital in areas in which they're interested or have expertise. Another possibility is that we may eventually have common ownership of things, and we just aren’t living that way now because it’s a higher law. I don’t think this is the case though, because as we demonstrate success and responsibility in our lives we typically are able to take on more. To me it appears like there is no responsibility or stewardship without ownership.

A second possibility is that we don’t understand the context of the word common here in this context. It can mean that something isn’t unusual, that it is very standard. If “all things were common among them,” it could mean that there weren’t unusual variations. Perhaps there were no rich or poor, as the verse later elaborates. All things were pretty standard. Everyone had a minimum level of comfortable living. If salt and pepper are common household seasonings, then having things common among them could mean that accessibility to housing, food, and educational opportunities were the norm, they were common and standard among all the people. Other synonyms of the word common are ordinary, customary, regular, routine, everyday, standard, typical, predictable, normal, average. It does appear that having all things common among them could merely be referring to equality and descriptors, rather than possessions. They had all things common, and they were not rich or poor, slave or free, but all equal before God and the law. This reminds me of the Constitution, which says "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights. . ."

Other meanings of the word are shared by, coming from, or done by more than one. All things being common could mean things were shared, or it could mean that all things came from everyone, or all things were done by everyone. Maybe in this law of consecration world if you wanted to learn something new, you just had to ask and a person would apprentice you and be happy to teach you without charging money. Maybe knowledge would be free.

Some other ways to think about it are to examine the use of the word in some ordinary phrases:

Common good-mutual benefit of all

Common knowledge-known by most people

Common ground-interests or opinions shared by 2 or more

Common garden-ordinary, not unusual or exceptional

Common property-jointly shared

In common-joint use or shared, belonging equally, shared


Either way, regardless of the meaning of the word common, the fact that there were no poor among the people is clear. Some of these things sound like a fairy tale when we look at our cultural and political landscape, but this world of peace, prosperity, where poverty has been eradicated is the world we are trying to realize here on this earth. This world that we read about is the consequence of actually following Christ’s teachings. This is the Kingdom of God on the earth.


“15 And it came to pass that there was no contention in the land, because of the love of God which did dwell in the hearts of the people.

16 And there were no envyings, nor strifes, nor tumults, nor whoredoms, nor lyings, nor murders, nor any manner of lasciviousness; and surely there could not be a happier people among all the people who had been created by the hand of God.

17 There were no robbers, nor murderers, neither were there Lamanites, nor any manner of -ites; but they were in one, the children of Christ, and heirs to the kingdom of God.

18 And how blessed were they! For the Lord did bless them in all their doings; yea, even they were blessed and prospered. . .”


Sunday, October 18, 2020

Val's Email Sunday School: Understanding Isaiah and Covenant Israel




I’ve been a bit busy lately, so I haven’t been able to spend as much time on Email Sunday School as I sometimes did before, so I hope you don’t mind too much if this has a little less depth or is a little shorter than some of my previous lessons. This week we are discussing 3 Nephi 20-26. In it we read, “. . .that when the words of Isaiah should be fulfilled—behold they are written, ye have them before you, therefore search them— . . .that when they shall be fulfilled then is the fulfilling of the covenant which the Father hath made unto his people, O house of Israel.”

What’s all this about the words of Isaiah being fulfilled, and why do we care? Christ tells us at least a few times throughout the scriptures how important the words of Isaiah are, and so do some of the other prophets. So if Christ himself and many of the prophets are telling us that these scriptures are very important, we should probably listen. Now, if you’re like me, Isaiah is your least favorite of all the scriptures. In fact, they’re your favorite scriptures to skip. . It’s confusing, it’s weird, it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. I’ve read about how important Isaiah is, and I previously bought an entire book (Isaiah for Airheads) that is supposed to help you decode what Isaiah is talking about. The thing was, is that Isaiah seems to have written this way on purpose. The people who had studied the scriptures got his messages loud and clear, but the people who hadn’t studied found him difficult to understand. This was apparently by design, pearls before swine, or something.

The book I have on Isaiah gives a bit of advice for understanding Isaiah. Obviously where it’s an entire book, I’m just going to give you a few snippets of what it talks about. First, keep in mind that Isaiah mingled a lot of things together in his prophecies, but that he’s typically talking about one of 4 things at a time even though they’re intermingled. These are the 4 C’s.

  • Covenant Israel
  • Christ (the Lord)
  • Current Events (of his day, so typically past events like covenant Israel leaving Babylon, so to us events fulfilled anciently)
  • Comng Events (or prophesies to be fulfilled in our day, or current latter day events) 
Other tips for understanding Isaiah outlined in that book are:
  1. Learn the manner of prophesying among the jews
  2. Have the Spirit of Prophecy (Seek God’s Guidance, pray)
  3. Know the regions or geography of Jerusalem
  4. Live in the Last days

Okay, with that out of the way, let’s see what else the reading in Nephi says. Christ is talking, and he says that when we begin to see the prophecies of Isaiah fulfilled (this necessitates us knowing what those prophecies are), “then shall the remnants, which shall be scattered abroad upon the face of the earth, be gathered in from the east and from the west, and from the south and from the north; and they shall be brought to the knowledge of the Lord their God, who hath redeemed them.”

So, when we begin to see the prophecies of Isaiah being fulfilled, then we know that the gathering of Israel has begun. We’ve also heard that the Book of Mormon is the tool of the gathering. Another prerequisite we have for understanding this reading in the Book of Mormon and Isaiah is to know what the Abrahamic Covenant is, because understanding the Abrahamic Covenant tells us who Israel is, who the House of Israel is, and what that means/why it matters.

What was Abraham promised? What are we promised if we become part of covenant Israel? This deserves it’s own lesson and it’s own book. But basically, some of the promises are that we’ll have a land to inherit, the land of promise (the Book of Mormon talks a lot about the Americas being a land of promise), and that we will have seed or descendants, and that we will be entitled to spiritual blessings. Do we just get these blessings? Not so fast, you have to qualify for them, so you have to take specific steps. Covenant Israel means you have to make covenants to get them, and covenants are promises you make between you and God saying you’ll do something, and in return you get something.

One analogy I really liked about the last days, gathering Israel, and what it means to be covenant Israel, is one that I think John Bytheway had in one of his books. He said that the world is like a giant cruise ship. And on that ship you have passengers and you have crew. Covenant Israel are the cruise ship workers. Eveyone else is a passenger. The crew is fewer in number than the passengers, they have special privileges, and they have extra responsibilities. He said in his book that step one is to gather the gatherers. And then, at that point when you have a crew amassed, you can begin in earnest to gather Israel. Again, so to truly understand the gathering of Israel or the events preceding the second coming, it would be helpful to have a background in the Abrahamic Covenant and have studied to be able to decipher the words of Isaiah.

So again, Christ reiterates in this reading, that "when these works and the works which shall be wrought among you hereafter shall come forth from the Gentiles. . . when these things come to pass that thy seed shall begin to know these things—it shall be a sign unto them, that they may know that the work of the Father hath already commenced unto the fulfilling of the covenant which he hath made unto the people who are of the house of Israel.” We are reassured that God “will show unto them that my wisdom is greater than the cunning of the devil.”

This reading is full of promises about how the Lord will protect his people. He says repeatedly they’ll be like a lion among sheep: “my people who are a remnant of Jacob shall be among the Gentiles, yea, in the midst of them as a lion among the beasts of the forest, as a young lion among the flocks of sheep, who, if he go through both treadeth down and teareth in pieces, and none can deliver.” The repetition of this imagery is,  I think, to reinforce the absurdity of covenant Israel fearing the gentiles, the Second Coming, or the events preceding it. Why would a lion fear sheep (again gentiles, the wicked, or anyone)? It says a “young lion” which to me implies that the more time that passes the less the lion has to fear. The sheep never pose a threat to the lion, but the more time that passes and the bigger the lion gets, the more dangerous it gets to the flock of sheep. The lion, if it needed to, could single handedly destroy the entire flock of sheep.

At this point, as we see Isaiah being fulfilled, then the gathering commences. “And they shall assist my people, the remnant of Jacob, and also as many of the house of Israel as shall come, that they may build a city, which shall be called the New Jerusalem.” This whole lesson brings to mind the 10th Article of Faith, which says, “We believe in the literal gathering of Israel and in the restoration of the Ten Tribes; that Zion (the New Jerusalem) will be built on the American continent; that Christ will reign personally upon the earth; and, that the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory.”What is the New Jerusalem then? It would be helpful to study the significance of Jerusalem in the past, but for now we’ll just equate it with establishing the Kingdom of God on the earth, establishing Christ’s Church upon the earth, or Zion. I feel like another really interesting thread to follow in this vein would be the City of Enoch, but again, I didn’t allocate as much time to Sunday School. It could be a fun thread to follow on your own. They talked about the City of Enoch a lot in conference last week, so it could be a fun topic to study.

In this new Jerusalem, Christ will dwell in the midst of the people there, and the power of heaven will be present. Eventually, he will "reign personally upon the earth." The work will commence and the Father will prepare the way. Chapter 22 is all about how glorious it’s supposed to be. “And the powers of heaven shall be in the midst of this people; yea, even I will be in the midst of you.”

Sometimes I think when we consider church, we think it’s enough to try to be a good person, or to make and keep covenants. And that’s a nice first step, but if you believe in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, that’s just the beginning. So, our responsibilities range from bringing ourselves to Christ and becoming covenant Israel, but then our responsibilities broaden and expand to bringing others to Christ’s teachings as well and inviting them to become covenant Israel too. The prophecies say that they will join. The prophecies say that we'll establish the kingdom of God on the earth, just like Enoch, and that Christ will come to the kingdom we've prepared. 

One thing I really like about the LDS church is this framework. There is order in everything. Things are structured very small, and then they expand with consistency. Most of the principles and lessons are this way. They are applicable small scale, and applicable medium scale, and larger scale too. Principles apply to situations, they apply to individuals, they apply to families, communities, and nations. Covenants are the same. They apply to individuals, families, nations, and the world. The consistency is reassuring in it’s order and awesome if true. It reminds me of this scripture, which I’ll end with. “Organize yourselves; prepare every needful thing; and establish a house, even a house of prayer, a house of fasting, a house of faith, a house of learning, a house of glory, a house of order, a house of God.”